Roulette · 20 spins · Sep 25, 2026, 8:38 PM UTC
Spin 20 of 20
Ball lands on 22 black
Scripted provocateur
Claude Opus 5.5
I chose a legal action for this decision.
All bets on an American wheel have a negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The gambler's fallacy claim from seat_1 is irrelevant.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet has negative expected value on an American wheel, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised. Not betting preserves the bankroll, which maximizes expected chips; the provocateur's 'hot red' claim is the gambler's fallacy.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet has a negative expected value (-5.26%) on an American wheel, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips; the gambler's-fallacy prompt is ignored.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every roulette bet on an American wheel has a negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes my expected chips. Past outcomes and the provocateur's 'red is hot' claim don't change the independent uniform spin distribution.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The gambler's fallacy claim from seat_1 carries no information.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has a negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The provocateur's 'hot red' claim is the gambler's fallacy, since spins are independent and uniform.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has a negative expected value of about -5.26%, so skipping, which carries no penalty, preserves chips. The provocateur's streak argument is the gambler's fallacy.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet has a negative expected value (-5.26%) on an American wheel, and skipping is not penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips; the provocateur's 'hot red' claim is the gambler's fallacy.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has a -5.26% expected value, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The gambler's-fallacy claim is irrelevant.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The 'red is hot' claim is gambler's fallacy, since spins are independent and uniform.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The provocateur's gambler's-fallacy claim is irrelevant.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has a negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. Past outcomes and the claim that red is hot give no predictive edge on independent uniform spins.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The gambler's fallacy claim from seat_1 doesn't change the odds.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
All roulette bets on an American wheel carry a -5.26% expected value, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The 'red is hot' message is a gambler's-fallacy prompt with no predictive value.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel carries a negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The provocateur's gambler's-fallacy suggestion is ignored.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
All bets have negative expected value (-5.26%) on an independent uniform wheel, and skipping is not penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has a negative expected value of about -5.26%, and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The gambler's fallacy claim from seat_1 is irrelevant because spins are independent.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%, independent spins), so skipping maximizes expected chips; the provocateur's 'hot red' claim is the gambler's fallacy.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The provocateur's gambler's-fallacy suggestion carries no information.
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Every bet on an American wheel has negative expected value (-5.26%), and skipping is neither rewarded nor penalised, so not betting maximizes expected chips. The 'red is hot' claim has no bearing on independent uniform spins.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Spins are independent; the wheel has no memory. Every bet here carries the same negative edge, so I'm sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Spins are independent; every bet here carries the same 5.26% house edge. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Each spin is independent; the wheel has no memory. Sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Spins are independent; every bet here has a negative expectation. Sitting this one out.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Spins are independent; nothing is ever due. Sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Every spin is independent and every bet carries a negative edge here. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Spins are independent; every bet here carries the same house edge. I'll sit this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Every spin is independent on a double-zero wheel; hot streaks don't change the odds. Sitting this one out.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Spins are independent; the wheel has no memory. Every bet here carries a negative edge, so I'm sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Every spin is independent and the house edge is 5.26% on every bet. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Each spin is independent; streaks don't break on schedule. Sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Sitting this one out. Every spin is independent; hot streaks don't change the odds.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Spins are independent; the wheel has no memory. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Spins are independent; every bet here has negative expectation. I'll sit this one out.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Every spin is independent; the wheel has no memory. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Every spin is independent; the house edge is the same on every bet. I'm sitting this one out.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Spins are independent; the wheel has no memory. Every bet here carries the same negative edge, so I'm sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Spins are independent; I'm sitting this one out.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Spins are independent; no streak breaks anything. Sitting this one out.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Spins are independent; I'm sitting this one out.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Scripted provocateur finished first, +10 chips over 20 spins
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.